Skip to main content

Julie Gray, Persona Non Grata

Yeah, I know it sounds like I'm doing the "oh, poor me, everyone hates me" bullshit. This is not that. I am well and widely hated and vilified. I also happen to know for a fact that some people love me. Almost to the point of fandom. This has been the dichotomy of my adopted existence. My difference... my unusualness... my downright WEIRDNESS and inability to "fit in" has always caused my peers and society to have this reaction to me. I'm loved, I'm hated, and there's really no in between.

I was going to bore you with the narrative of how, over the course of thirteen months, I went from coddled newb to everyone's favorite villain in adoptionland, but the people who will actually read this already know. So I'll just cut to the chase.

I understand why I'm disliked by relinquishers, adopters, and adoptees alike. What I don't understand is the double standard.

Relinquishers hate me because I insist that anyone not BSE did indeed have a choice. I insist that claiming you are a victim with no choice when it comes to the child you give birth to is not only disingenuous, but also disempowering and dehumanizing. It is far more dehumanizing to claim you had no power over the fate of your child than it is to be called a relinquisher, but instead of reclaiming their power by owning their choices, they want to simper and whine about how dangerous and angry I am, and how dehumanizing it is to be called a relinquisher. They dehumanized themselves when they gave up the fight and the child. They don't need me to do it for them. I am, however, a convenient deflection and likely scapegoat because of my hard and unwavering views. They hate me because adoptee pain scares them.

Adopters hate me because I won't concede that adoption is a wonderful way to build a family. Because no matter how evil and awful "their child's" parents are painted to be, I won't agree that they are "the best parent for my child". They hate me because I routunely point out that adoption is nothing more than a legal way to purchase another human, and that what happens to our identities is a violation of our basic human rights. They hate me because I insist on talking about developmental trauma and the displacement adoptees feel. They hate me because I insist that in most cases RAD is just a diagnosis to blame the adoptee for their parenting difficulties and inability to deal with trauma. They hate me because they fear their child will be me someday. Because adoptee pain scares them.

Adoptees... this one is more complex, but can be boiled down to a couple of simple ideas. The first being that fogged and partially fogged adoptees are completely uncomfortable with my hard unforgiveness of the perpetrators of adoption (adopters and relinquishers). The second is my brazen pointing out of problematic ideas and behaviors (for example, using your adoptee status to extort money from other adoptees for your memoir or your t-shirts [or your writing program, or your $600 a weekend adoptee retreat...]). The third is because I absolutely REFUSE to be tone policed. I don't believe that tact will solve anything, when tact, false smiles, fake niceness, and false promises are what caused most of our problems in the first place. 

I understand it. I truly do. I HATE being called on my shit, but goddamnit I have to own it. I'm an abrasive, uncompromising hardass. I'm hard as hell to talk to at times, and while I will admit that I am wrong, you REALLY have to prove it before I will. It's easy to hate me. And it's MUCH easier to hate someone like me than it is to admit that one is wrong. I'm guilty of it myself.

What I don't understand is all these individuals, pages, and platforms who  constantly claim to want to "elevate adoptee voices"... except the ones that are too honest, too disagreeable, or too outspoken. Adoptees like me are regularly banned and blocked from these pages. Adoptees who "had a bad experience" and aren't afraid to talk about it. Adoptees who aren't afraid to point out problematic behaviors and language.

I could give you a LONG list of pages, groups, and well known adoptionland residents that have me blocked and the conversations that caused it, but that would be childish. Suffice to say I do almost all of my adoption talk on Twitter now, because most of the adoption related pages and groups on Facebook are inaccessible to me.

So they want to elevate adoptee voices, because all of our stories, voices, and opinions matter. Except mine, and that of the people who speak their truths frankly and unabashedly. Because we aren't "nice enough". We won't "just get along". And we won't "reframe our points in a more sympathetic way to promote understanding".

So all adoptee voices matter... except mine, of course.

Feel free to share if you're one of the silenced.

Comments

  1. Barn: cheered me up, i'm definitely a fan! we ought to be the nice club

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dismissive Language: Tone Policing and Other Damaging Habits

Dismissive tactics are fairly well understood, especially in social justice and debate circles. In the adoption arena, however, these tactics take on a willful blindness and venom which is truly disturbing. Let's explore some of the most commonly used phrases.

"Not all adoptions are the same."
"What if the mother won't parent?"
"Well what do you suggest, then?"
"I'm sorry you had a bad experience, but..."

Really, I could fill a blog with "phrases commonly used to dismiss anyone who has anything negative to say about adoption" but I won't waste my time or yours reiterating that familiar drivel. We all know the phrases. We've all been told we "just had a bad experience".  We all have experience with those that dismiss because they don't like our tone.

Dismiss being the key word. Phrases like "not all...", "what if...", angry, bitter, bad experience, and "can't we all be nice to eac…

Sibling Connection

I was robbed of the connections that belonged to me. The connection to my blood, my biology, and the life I should have had were severed by my mother when she chose to abandon me with my father. She had already taken one sibling from me at that point, my older sister, relinquished at three years old, not too long before I came along. She would go on to take eight more; the six she passed out to her friends as they came out of her, like litter after litter of unwanted kittens, and the two my father kept. He would have kept me, too, had my mother not effectively ostracized him from his family with her habits and then abandoned him with a four month old baby. On her side, eight children scattered to six different families... no chance for connection there.

But with my father's side, I will always feel the missed opportunity. I will always believe there was a chance in the pages somewhere with them that was missed. Part of me will always feel like I blew it with my honesty. You see, I …

Adoptive Parent Fragility

I'm curious, how do you expect to raise an adoptee when you can't even handle talking to one online?

Really. Riddle me this, because I want to know. Let's say, for sake of argument, I put forth the theory that an AP feels more bonded to their adoptee than the adoptee feels to them. I suggest that it's possible that, as most of us do, the adoptee is afraid to share any unhappiness they may feel. That they are subverting that unhappiness to soothe the AP. Adoptees are notorious people pleasers and often do live in terror of displeasing APs. I suggest that, when asked, an adoptee is likely to lie about their detachment, so as not to disappoint the AP and out of fear of rejection.

Some APs take advantage of his level of depth and openness to examine their own families and consider ways ways to solidify their attachments to their adoptees.


Fragile APs will insist they know how their children feel. "MY child is bonded with ME," they'll say. "I can FEEL it.&qu…